CustomsGenius
← All Publications
News

Manufacturing Drawback: 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) and (b) Guide

Published: November 3, 2026  ·  5 min read
Manufacturing Drawback: 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) and (b) Guide
Photo: EqualStock IN / Pexels

Key Points

On this page

  1. How manufacturing drawback works under 1313(a) and (b)
  2. What counts as manufacture or production
  3. General and specific manufacturing drawback rulings
  4. The bill of materials and production records
  5. Timing and filing the claim in ACE
  6. What importers should do
  7. Key references

The links in this article go to the primary documents: the statute, the regulations, and CBP's own pages. Read the source.

Short answer: Manufacturing drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) and (b) lets a manufacturer recover 99 percent of the duties paid on imported merchandise when an article made with it is exported or destroyed. The manufacturer works under a general or specific ruling, proves the link with a bill of materials and production records, and files the claim in ACE within the five-year window counted from importation.

How manufacturing drawback works under 1313(a) and (b)

Both subsections refund duties on imported merchandise used in manufacture or production. They differ in how the imported merchandise is tied to the finished article.

Direct identification under 1313(a)

Under 1313(a), the imported merchandise itself is used to make an article that is exported or destroyed. The refund is 99 percent of the duties paid on that imported merchandise. The claimant must be able to trace the specific imported inputs into the exported or destroyed article.

Substitution under 1313(b)

Under 1313(b), the merchandise used in manufacture does not have to be the imported merchandise. It must be classifiable under the same eight-digit HTS subheading as the imported merchandise, and it must be used within five years of the importation. This helps manufacturers who hold imported and domestic inputs in common inventory and cannot tell them apart.

Section 1313(l) limits the substitution refund to 99 percent of the lesser of two figures: the duties paid on the import, or the duties that would apply to the substituted merchandise. Substitution cannot produce a larger refund than the duties actually at stake on either side.

Substitution also applies to unused merchandise, which follows different rules. See Unused Merchandise Drawback Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j).

What counts as manufacture or production

Drawback under this provision requires a manufacture or production, not just handling. The definition in 19 CFR 190.2 covers two situations:

Cleaning, repacking, sorting, or simple assembly that leaves the article's name, character, and use unchanged raises a real question under this test. Document the transformation before you apply for a ruling, because the ruling will rest on how you describe the process.

General and specific manufacturing drawback rulings

A manufacturer needs a ruling before it can claim. The rulings are governed by 19 CFR part 190, and there are two routes.

General manufacturing drawback rulings

The general rulings are published in an appendix to part 190. They describe common manufacturing situations. A manufacturer whose operation fits one of them joins it by sending a letter, rather than applying for an individual ruling. Read the general ruling text closely, since your process, inputs, and records must match what it describes.

Specific manufacturing drawback rulings

When no general ruling fits, the manufacturer applies for a specific ruling. In words, the application describes the company and its facilities, the imported merchandise to be used, the manufacturing or production process, the articles produced, whether the claims will rely on direct identification or substitution, and the records system that will support the claims. Be precise about the process, because CBP's decision depends on it.

Do not assume a ruling covers a new product line or a changed process. If your operation moves outside what the ruling describes, review whether the ruling still applies.

The bill of materials and production records

The bill of materials is the core document. It lists the inputs that go into each finished article, including the imported merchandise, and ties quantities to units of output. Production records then show what was actually made, when, and from which inputs.

A defensible record set generally lets you show:

Keep the bill of materials consistent with the production records. A gap between what the bill says and what the floor records show is the most common point where claims get questioned.

Timing and filing the claim in ACE

The export window runs five years from the date of importation of the merchandise. Track that date for each entry line you plan to claim against, especially under substitution, where inventory can sit for a long time before use.

Claims are filed electronically in ACE. For the filing mechanics, entry-level steps, and documentation common to all drawback types, see Customs Duty Drawback: How to File Under 19 U.S.C. 1313. For defective goods returned to the supplier, a different provision applies: Rejected Merchandise Drawback under 1313(c).

What importers should do

Key references


Working through tariffs on real entries? Create an account, then see plans for the full toolkit.

About the Author

Franz Brotzen, CustomsGenius CEO & Founder. Franz is a published researcher on U.S. trade policy. He has worked at think tanks in Washington DC and Tokyo, where his academic publications focussed on tariffs and legal compliance. Franz received his JD from Harvard Law School.

Request Beta Access

Get early access to CustomsGenius and start recovering IEEPA refunds faster.

Beta Pilot Ongoing