CustomsGenius
← All Publications
News

Rejected Merchandise Drawback: 19 U.S.C. 1313(c) Claim Guide

Published: November 2, 2026  ·  6 min read
Rejected Merchandise Drawback: 19 U.S.C. 1313(c) Claim Guide
Photo: Wojciech Kotlicki / Pexels

Key Points

On this page

  1. What rejected merchandise drawback covers
  2. The four qualifying situations
  3. Refund amount, time limit, and export or destruction
  4. Filing the notice of intent and the ACE claim
  5. Records for e-commerce retail returns
  6. What importers should do
  7. Key references

The links in this article go to the primary documents: the statute, the regulations, and CBP's own pages. Read the source.

Direct answer: Rejected merchandise drawback is a duty refund under 19 U.S.C. 1313(c). It is available when imported goods do not conform to sample or specifications, were shipped without the consignee's consent, were defective when imported, or were sold at retail and returned. You get back 99 percent of the duties, taxes, and fees paid, as long as the goods are exported or destroyed under CBP supervision within five years of importation.

What rejected merchandise drawback covers

Drawback is the refund of duties on goods that do not stay in U.S. commerce. Most people think of manufacturing or unused-merchandise drawback. Section 1313(c) is different: the goods are not used in manufacturing and are not matched with substitute goods. They are simply rejected, and the refund follows the rejected goods out of the country or into supervised destruction.

This makes it one of the more direct recovery routes. There is no need to identify a manufacturing process or a substitute article. The core of the claim is proving that the specific goods came in on a specific entry, qualified under one of the statutory grounds, and left or were destroyed under CBP supervision. For the general drawback process, see how to file customs duty drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313.

The four qualifying situations

Nonconforming goods

The merchandise does not conform to the sample or specifications on which the purchase was based. The importer needs the order, specification, or sample, plus evidence of how the goods differ.

Goods shipped without the consignee's consent

The seller sent goods the consignee never agreed to buy. Purchase orders, correspondence, and shipping documents showing no authorization are the natural proof.

Goods defective at the time of importation

The defect must exist when the goods were imported. Damage that occurs later, such as in a U.S. warehouse or during customer use, does not fit this ground. Inspection reports, photographs, and quality records help show the defect predates importation.

Goods sold at retail and returned

The statute also covers merchandise ultimately sold at retail by the importer or its distributor and then returned. This is the ground most relevant to e-commerce and consumer-goods importers. The goods can be in any condition on return, but the sale and return must be documented.

Goods that do not fit any of these four grounds may still qualify under another drawback provision. One example is unused merchandise drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j).

Refund amount, time limit, and export or destruction

The five-year clock runs from importation, not from the date you discover the problem. Importers with older entries should check dates before spending effort on a claim.

Filing the notice of intent and the ACE claim

The procedures are in 19 CFR part 190. Two steps matter most.

  1. Notice of intent. Before exporting or destroying, file CBP Form 7553 so CBP can decide whether to witness the export or destruction. Do not move or destroy goods until you have followed the notice process. See CBP Form 7553: notice of intent to export or destroy.
  2. Drawback claim in ACE. After the export or destruction, file the claim electronically in ACE, identifying the import entry and the goods and supplying proof of export or destruction.

CBP's drawback page is the starting point for current filing guidance. Brokers and in-house teams should confirm how their ACE access and drawback permissions are set up before a claim is due.

Records for e-commerce retail returns

Retail returns are where claims most often fail, because high volumes of small returns make it easy to lose the chain of documents. Part 190 expects records that tie the returned goods back to the import entry. For each claim, an e-commerce importer should be able to produce:

Linking units to entries

The harder question is identifying which import entry a returned unit came from. Inventory systems that track lot, SKU, and receiving date make this possible. If your system cannot trace a unit to an entry, set up a consistent, documented method for allocating returns to entries before you file. Apply the same method every time and keep the supporting data.

What importers should do

Key references


Working through tariffs on real entries? Create an account, then see plans for the full toolkit.

About the Author

Franz Brotzen, CustomsGenius CEO & Founder. Franz is a published researcher on U.S. trade policy. He has worked at think tanks in Washington DC and Tokyo, where his academic publications focussed on tariffs and legal compliance. Franz received his JD from Harvard Law School.

Request Beta Access

Get early access to CustomsGenius and start recovering IEEPA refunds faster.

Beta Pilot Ongoing