CustomsGenius
← All Publications
News

Customs Entry Liquidation: The One-Year Clock, Extensions, and Notices

Published: October 2, 2026  ·  9 min read
Customs Entry Liquidation: The One-Year Clock, Extensions, and Notices
Photo: Leeloo The First / Pexels

Key Points

On this page

  1. What customs entry liquidation is and why it matters
  2. The one-year statutory clock and how it starts
  3. The ACE scheduled liquidation at 314 days
  4. Extensions: rules, limits, and notice requirements
  5. Deemed liquidation when deadlines are missed
  6. The bulletin notice of liquidation
  7. What liquidation means for refunds and additional duty bills
  8. What importers should do
  9. Key references

Customs entry liquidation is the final step in the lifecycle of an import entry. CBP reviews the entry, calculates the correct duties, fees, and taxes, and issues a formal determination. If the amount differs from what the importer deposited at the time of entry, CBP either issues a bill for additional duties or authorizes a refund. Until liquidation occurs, no duty amount is truly final.

The links in this article go to the primary documents: the statutes, regulations, and official CBP pages themselves. Read the source.

What customs entry liquidation is and why it matters

When goods are imported into the United States, the importer (or their broker) files an entry and deposits estimated duties based on the declared classification, value, and applicable duty rates. That deposit is just an estimate. Liquidation is the moment CBP makes the legal determination of what was actually owed.

Liquidation can result in three outcomes:

Because liquidation sets the legally binding duty amount, it also starts the clock on the importer's right to protest CBP's decision. Missing the protest window after liquidation means losing that avenue for recourse. The regulations governing liquidation are found in 19 CFR Part 159.

The one-year statutory clock and how it starts

The statutory authority for liquidation timelines is 19 U.S.C. 1504. The statute establishes that CBP must liquidate an entry within one year of the date of entry. For consumption entries, the clock typically begins on the date the entry summary is filed and accepted by CBP, though the specific trigger can vary by entry type. Importers and brokers should confirm the applicable date for each entry in ACE.

The one-year rule is not a target, it is a legal requirement. If CBP does not act within that window, specific consequences follow automatically under the statute (see the deemed liquidation section below).

The ACE scheduled liquidation at 314 days

Within CBP's Automated Commercial Environment (ACE), entries are typically placed on a liquidation schedule approximately 314 days after the date of entry. This internal scheduling gives CBP and its partner government agencies time to review the entry, process any requests for information, and complete any pending actions, all before the one-year statutory deadline arrives.

Importers and brokers can monitor scheduled liquidation dates through ACE. An entry appearing on the 314-day schedule is on track for timely liquidation. If a review is still pending close to that date, CBP may extend the liquidation rather than let the clock expire. If you are tracking entry data at scale, understanding how ACE schedules liquidation is essential. For context on how ACE data is used in CBP's review processes, see our related article on what an importer risk assessment from ACE data looks like.

Extensions: rules, limits, and notice requirements

CBP may extend the liquidation period when it needs more time to complete its review. Common reasons include:

How extensions work under 19 U.S.C. 1504

Under 19 U.S.C. 1504, CBP may extend the liquidation period in increments of up to one year at a time. However, the total period from the date of entry to final liquidation cannot exceed four years in all. That means a maximum of one initial year plus three annual extensions, for a total of four years.

CBP is required to provide notice to the importer of record when it extends a liquidation. These extension notices are issued through the bulletin notice system and are visible in ACE. Importers should not assume silence from CBP means liquidation has occurred. Always verify the status in ACE or through your broker.

Voluntary requests for extension

In certain circumstances, the importer of record may request that CBP extend the liquidation of an entry. This is less common but can be strategically relevant when the importer is awaiting a ruling, a refund claim, or a resolution of a related legal matter. Procedures for such requests are governed by 19 CFR Part 159.

Deemed liquidation when deadlines are missed

If CBP fails to liquidate an entry or issue a valid extension notice within the applicable statutory period, the entry is "deemed liquidated" by operation of law under 19 U.S.C. 1504. Deemed liquidation occurs at the rate and amount asserted by the importer in the entry, meaning the estimated duties deposited at the time of filing become the final, legally binding amount.

Deemed liquidation can work in the importer's favor if CBP would otherwise have assessed higher duties. But it can also cut off the importer's ability to receive a refund if CBP would have liquidated at a lower rate. Deemed liquidation is a specific legal event with its own procedures for recognition and protest. Because it has significant implications, it merits its own detailed treatment; this article links to that discussion rather than reproducing it.

The bulletin notice of liquidation

Once an entry is liquidated, CBP issues a formal bulletin notice of liquidation. Historically, these notices were posted physically at the port of entry. Today, in the ACE environment, bulletin notices of liquidation are issued electronically and are accessible through ACE, typically to the importer of record and the filer of record.

The bulletin notice is legally significant for two reasons:

Importers and brokers should have a process for monitoring bulletin notices in ACE promptly, rather than waiting for a paper statement or broker notification. A missed notice can mean a missed protest deadline. Because bulletin notices are also their own distinct topic, this article treats them at the overview level and links to the dedicated term page for full procedural detail.

What liquidation means for refunds and additional duty bills

Refunds after liquidation

When liquidation results in a finding that the importer overpaid duties, CBP authorizes a refund. The refund is typically applied as a credit against the importer's continuous bond account or paid directly, depending on the payment method used. Interest on overpayments may be paid to the importer, calculated from the date of overpayment under rules in 19 CFR Part 159.

Importers pursuing duty refunds through post-entry amendments, protests, or other mechanisms must coordinate those filings with the liquidation timeline. A refund claim filed after liquidation generally must be pursued through the protest process within the 180-day window.

Additional duty bills after liquidation

When liquidation results in a finding of underpayment, CBP issues a bill for the additional duties owed. Interest accrues on the underpayment from the date of liquidation. Failure to pay timely can result in referral for collection. Importers who believe a liquidation bill is incorrect must file a protest within the applicable deadline; paying a bill does not waive the right to protest, but the protest must still be timely filed.

For entries subject to antidumping or countervailing duties, the final liquidated amount can differ substantially from the estimated cash deposit rate, particularly when Commerce issues a final results order after the initial entry. This is one of the most common sources of surprise duty bills in trade compliance.

What importers should do

Key references


Working through tariffs on real entries? Try the free duty calculator, then see plans for the full toolkit.

About the Author

Franz Brotzen, CustomsGenius CEO & Founder. Franz is a published researcher on U.S. trade policy. He has worked at think tanks in Washington DC and Tokyo, where his academic publications focussed on tariffs and legal compliance. Franz received his JD from Harvard Law School.

Request Beta Access

Get early access to CustomsGenius and start recovering IEEPA refunds faster.

Beta Pilot Ongoing