CustomsGenius
← All Publications
News

9903.79.05 Semiconductors 232: The R&D Exemption Explained

Published: August 14, 2026  ·  8 min read
9903.79.05 Semiconductors 232: The R&D Exemption Explained
Photo: ThisIsEngineering / Pexels

Key Points

On this page

  1. What 9903.79.05 is and what it does
  2. The Section 232 semiconductors program and its structure
  3. Which goods qualify: semiconductor articles and the R&D requirement
  4. Rate and duty stacking: what you actually pay
  5. How 9903.79.05 appears on a CBP entry
  6. Sibling exemption headings and how they compare
  7. What importers should do
  8. Key references

HTS 9903.79.05 is an exemption heading within the Section 232 semiconductors program. Importers who qualify under it are not subject to the Section 232 semiconductor duty on their shipments; they pay only whatever rate applies in the underlying Chapter 1-97 subheading. As of August 14, 2026, the heading covers semiconductor articles, as defined in subdivision (b) of U.S. note 39, that are imported for research and development in the United States, as defined in subdivision (d) of U.S. note 39. The links in this article go to the primary documents: the official tariff schedule, CBP guidance pages, and Federal Register notices themselves. Read the source.

What 9903.79.05 is and what it does

Chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) is reserved for temporary and special-purpose provisions. Headings in the 9903.79.xx range belong to the Section 232 semiconductors program. Within that range, 9903.79.01 is the operative duty heading, meaning it is the provision that actually imposes additional Section 232 duties. Headings 9903.79.02 through 9903.79.09 are structured as exclusion and exception provisions under U.S. note 39 to the subchapter.

9903.79.05 falls squarely in that exclusion tier. Its official heading text reads: "Semiconductor articles, as defined in subdivision (b) of U.S. note 39 to this subchapter, that are for research and development in the United States, as defined in subdivision (d) of U.S. note 39 to this subchapter." The HTSUS general column rate for this heading is "the duty provided in the applicable subheading," which is the drafting convention used to signal that no additional duty is layered on by this heading itself.

The Section 232 semiconductors program and its structure

Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act authorizes the executive branch to impose tariffs or other trade restrictions when an investigation finds that imports of a particular product threaten national security. The semiconductors program under Section 232 applies that authority to a defined universe of semiconductor articles. The duty-imposing mechanism lives at 9903.79.01. Importers who cannot claim any exclusion or exception heading must report 9903.79.01 and pay the additional duty it carries.

U.S. note 39 to the subchapter is the legal framework that ties the program together. Its subdivisions define, among other things, what counts as a "semiconductor article" (subdivision (b)) and what qualifies as "research and development in the United States" (subdivision (d)). Every eligibility question for 9903.79.05 runs through those definitions. You can find the current text of U.S. note 39 in the official HTSUS at hts.usitc.gov. For broader context on how the Section 232 semiconductors action fits alongside other recent Section 232 expansions, see our article on Section 232 expanding to copper and related actions.

Which goods qualify: semiconductor articles and the R&D requirement

Semiconductor articles (subdivision (b))

Not every product that contains a chip is a "semiconductor article" for this program. Subdivision (b) of U.S. note 39 supplies the controlling definition. Importers and brokers must map their goods against that text, not against a general industry understanding of the term. Confirm the current subdivision (b) language in the HTSUS before classifying any shipment under 9903.79.05.

Research and development in the United States (subdivision (d))

The R&D requirement is the second gate. Subdivision (d) of U.S. note 39 defines what qualifies as research and development in the United States for purposes of this exemption. The definition controls: internal company usage of the phrase is not sufficient. Importers claiming 9903.79.05 should document, at the time of entry, how their intended use meets subdivision (d)'s criteria. If goods imported under this exemption are diverted to non-qualifying uses after entry, that diversion may create duty liability and could implicate CBP's subsequent-use rules.

Rate and duty stacking: what you actually pay

When 9903.79.05 is properly claimed, the Section 232 semiconductor duty that would otherwise apply through 9903.79.01 does not attach. The importer pays only the rate found in the underlying Chapter 1-97 subheading, that is, the normal column 1 general rate for goods from most trading partners, or the applicable column 2 or preferential rate depending on origin.

Other duties are not displaced by this exemption. Antidumping duties, countervailing duties, Section 301 tariffs, or any other applicable Chapter 99 provision may still stack on top of the Chapter 1-97 rate. 9903.79.05 speaks only to the Section 232 semiconductor duty; it says nothing about those other programs. Verify the full duty picture for your specific product and country of origin before finalizing landed-cost calculations. Our duty calculator can help you model stacking scenarios.

How 9903.79.05 appears on a CBP entry

Chapter 99 codes are reported as additional classification lines on CBP entry summaries; they ride alongside, not instead of, the regular Chapter 1-97 line. A typical entry for goods claimed under 9903.79.05 will show two classification lines for the affected merchandise:

CBP's Automated Broker Interface and ACE system expect this dual-line structure. Omitting 9903.79.05 from a qualifying entry means the system will look for the duty heading 9903.79.01 and assess Section 232 duties. Conversely, claiming 9903.79.05 on a shipment that does not satisfy the U.S. note 39 definitions is a classification error that can trigger penalties and back-duties. Check cbp.gov for any current CSMS messages addressing entry requirements for this program.

Sibling exemption headings and how they compare

9903.79.05 is one of several exception and exclusion headings under U.S. note 39. Importers should confirm they are using the correct heading for their specific situation:

Using the wrong sibling heading, or stacking more than one when only one applies, are common filing errors in new Section 232 programs. When in doubt, confirm current HTSUS text and any CBP guidance before filing.

What importers should do

Key references


Recovering IEEPA tariff refunds? Get started with CustomsGenius to streamline your refund process.

About the Author

Franz Brotzen, CustomsGenius CEO & Founder. Franz is a published researcher on U.S. trade policy. He has worked at think tanks in Washington DC and Tokyo, where his academic publications focussed on tariffs and legal compliance. Franz received his JD from Harvard Law School.

Request Beta Access

Get early access to CustomsGenius and start recovering IEEPA refunds faster.

Beta Pilot Ongoing