CustomsGenius
← All Publications
News

9903.01.32 (Ended): IEEPA Global Reciprocal Baseline Exemption

Published: October 16, 2026  ·  7 min read
9903.01.32 (Ended): IEEPA Global Reciprocal Baseline Exemption
Photo: Markus Winkler / Pexels

Key Points

On this page

  1. What HTS 9903.01.32 was and when it ended
  2. What this heading covered: an exemption, not a duty
  3. Product scope and enumerated subheadings
  4. How this heading appeared on a customs entry
  5. Interaction with other IEEPA program headings
  6. Refund and correction path for affected entries
  7. What importers should do
  8. Key references

HTS 9903.01.32 was a Chapter 99 exemption claim heading under the IEEPA Global Reciprocal Baseline program, created by Executive Order 14257. It applied a zero percent additional duty rate to qualifying articles from April 5, 2025 through February 23, 2026, and terminated on February 24, 2026. As of October 16, 2026, the heading is no longer in force. The links in this article go to the primary documents: the proclamations, Federal Register notices, and official tariff schedule pages themselves. Read the source.

What HTS 9903.01.32 was and when it ended

HTS 9903.01.32 was a Chapter 99 heading that sat within the IEEPA Global Reciprocal Baseline subchapter. Its official text read: "Articles the product of any country, classified in the subheadings enumerated in subdivision (v)(iii)(a) of U.S. note 2 to this subchapter." The heading was created under Executive Order 14257 and became effective on April 5, 2025.

The heading carried a rate of zero percent additional duty for its entire operative window, April 5, 2025 through February 23, 2026. On February 24, 2026, the heading terminated. It has carried no legal force since that date.

What this heading covered: an exemption, not a duty

9903.01.32 was an exemption, exception, or claim heading, not a duty-imposing heading. Where the IEEPA Global Reciprocal Baseline program's companion headings imposed additional duties on imported articles, 9903.01.32 operated in the opposite direction: an importer who properly claimed it on an entry was stating that the goods fell within the enumerated subheadings listed in U.S. note 2, subdivision (v)(iii)(a), and were therefore subject to no additional IEEPA duty under this heading.

That structure matters for compliance purposes. An importer who failed to claim 9903.01.32 during its operative window, and instead paid IEEPA duty under a companion duty heading, may have overpaid. The refund path for that situation is addressed below.

Product scope and enumerated subheadings

The subheadings covered by 9903.01.32 were those enumerated in subdivision (v)(iii)(a) of U.S. note 2 to the relevant Chapter 99 subchapter, as specified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule. All enumerated subheadings carried the same window: April 5, 2025 through February 24, 2026.

Among the subheadings that appeared under this heading are the following examples from the read set:

The read set above is a representative sample from the heading's subheading list. The full enumerated list was contained in subdivision (v)(iii)(a) of U.S. note 2 to the relevant Chapter 99 subchapter. Importers researching whether a specific subheading was covered should consult the HTSUS at hts.usitc.gov or confirm with a licensed customs broker, as the capped read set shown here may not reflect the heading's complete scope.

How this heading appeared on a customs entry

Chapter 99 headings such as 9903.01.32 rode alongside the ordinary Chapter 1-97 classification on a CBP Form 7501 entry summary. An importer claiming the exemption reported the underlying Chapter 1-97 subheading on one line and added 9903.01.32 as a secondary Chapter 99 classification on the same or an adjoining line. The Chapter 99 code signaled to CBP that the importer was asserting the enumerated-subheading exemption under U.S. note 2.

Because the heading itself imposed no additional duty, the net effect of a proper claim was that no IEEPA Global Reciprocal Baseline additional duty was assessed on the entry line. Where an importer omitted the claim and paid duty under a companion duty heading instead, that entry line potentially carried an unnecessary duty deposit.

Interaction with other IEEPA program headings

9903.01.32 sat alongside other Chapter 99 headings within the IEEPA Global Reciprocal Baseline program. Some of those companion headings imposed positive additional duties; 9903.01.32 was the vehicle by which qualifying goods within the enumerated subheadings were carved out from those positive-duty headings. For context on a related ended IEEPA baseline heading, see our article on 9903.01.25 (Ended): IEEPA Global Reciprocal Baseline, 10% Rate.

Importers with entries that also carried Section 301 or Section 232 obligations should confirm how those separate programs interacted with IEEPA headings during the operative window. That analysis depends on the specific goods and entry dates and is best confirmed against the current HTSUS and with a licensed broker.

Refund and correction path for affected entries

Because 9903.01.32 carried no additional duty of its own, the heading's termination on February 24, 2026 created no duty deposit under it to refund. There is nothing to recover from this heading directly.

However, if an importer paid IEEPA duty under a companion duty heading during the period April 5, 2025 through February 23, 2026, and that payment would not have been owed had the importer properly claimed 9903.01.32, that deposit may be recoverable. CBP's process for reviewing and correcting such entries is the CAPE process in ACE. The steps for seeking that refund are on the IEEPA tariff refund guide. Common reasons CAPE submissions are rejected are explained on the CAPE errors page.

To use the CAPE process, an importer typically needs the relevant entry numbers, the specific line items from the CBP Form 7501 showing the duty deposit, and the liquidation status of each entry. Confirm the exact documentation requirements against CBP's current guidance at cbp.gov before submitting.

What importers should do

Key references


Working through tariffs on real entries? Create an account, then see plans for the full toolkit.

About the Author

Franz Brotzen, CustomsGenius CEO & Founder. Franz is a published researcher on U.S. trade policy. He has worked at think tanks in Washington DC and Tokyo, where his academic publications focussed on tariffs and legal compliance. Franz received his JD from Harvard Law School.

Request Beta Access

Get early access to CustomsGenius and start recovering IEEPA refunds faster.

Beta Pilot Ongoing